| London | Spring 2016 |
I know I'm far from the first to pick up on this theme, with satirical websites like McSweeney's Internet Tendency featuring articles like "When My Grandkids Ask Me What I Did to Fight American Fascism, I'll Proudly Tell Them I Tweeted a Few Times". But I think Western culture currently faces a set of issues that I'll group together under the title of 'armchair humanitarianism'.
From the comfort of our living rooms we can watch the news or surf the web and immediately share our thoughts on one crisis after another with hundreds or thousands of 'friends'. This ability certainly has an upside, in that we are probably more aware of what is happening around the world than any previous generation. At the same time, the sheer number of tragedies and injustices can overwhelm and immobilise us, leaving us unsure where to contribute our time, our money -- even our attention.
We comment on Facebook or change a profile picture in a show of solidarity and assume that we've discharged our duty toward our fellow man. I'm 'woke', I know what's really happening in the world, and I've expressed my outrage at all the right people, so I've done my bit. We show how much we care, 'virtue signal' to others on social media, and consider that a good day's work. We expiate any guilt we feel in 140 characters.
We're attracted to sexy causes and issues -- often ones that celebrities are vocal about -- sometimes at the expense of equally important but less glamorous problems. For instance, AIDS rightly gets a lot of press, but did you know that (at least as of 2014) the WHO estimated that a child dies of malaria every minute? And while Americans are hand-wringing and bashing one another about differing views on healthcare (not that this isn't important), 200 more migrants/refugees are feared to have drowned, after two capsized boats were found off the coast of Libya. But this has almost ceased to be a story, because it has happened so many times before.
We forget old or failed causes and look for something new to care about. So we 'care deeply' about something for a short time -- even a long time -- and think that this alone makes us better people. The problem is, you can't eat moral outrage. You can't dress wounds with it, you can't stop conflicts with it. Solutions require action that reaches beyond the screen.
Information and empathy are important as we begin to address natural disasters, injustices, etc., but they are only a small part of what must happen. Too often I think we assume that once we've read and retweeted an article or two, we've done what we could and someone else must step in and get their hands dirty. But what if a whole generation thinks this way?
This is as much a challenge to myself as to anyone else to get out of the figurative armchair and put down the phone and sweat a little in the cause of what is right. I'm not calling for indiscriminate action, or for people necessarily to go to the far corners of the globe (there's plenty of injustice closer to home) but for each of us to take an active part in seeking solutions to the problems we see around us -- and ensuring that even the less glamorous or novel issues get the attention they need.
Little children, let us not love in word or talk but in deed and in truth.
I John 3:18



